🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, governments are channeling hundreds of billions into what's termed “sovereign AI” – building national machine learning systems. From Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are racing to create AI that comprehends local languages and cultural specifics.

The Worldwide AI Arms Race

This initiative is part of a larger global race spearheaded by large firms from the America and China. Whereas companies like a leading AI firm and a social media giant pour substantial funds, mid-sized nations are additionally making independent bets in the artificial intelligence domain.

Yet with such vast amounts involved, is it possible for developing countries secure significant advantages? As noted by a analyst from a well-known policy organization, “Unless you’re a wealthy state or a large corporation, it’s quite a challenge to create an LLM from nothing.”

National Security Considerations

A lot of nations are reluctant to use foreign AI technologies. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, for example, Western-developed AI systems have occasionally proven inadequate. One case involved an AI tool deployed to instruct students in a isolated community – it spoke in English with a strong American accent that was difficult to follow for native users.

Then there’s the state security factor. For the Indian defence ministry, employing specific international models is viewed inadmissible. According to a founder commented, “It could have some arbitrary training dataset that might say that, for example, a certain region is separate from India … Employing that specific model in a security environment is a serious concern.”

He continued, I’ve consulted experts who are in security. They want to use AI, but, setting aside specific systems, they are reluctant to rely on American technologies because details might go outside the country, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

Homegrown Projects

As a result, some states are supporting national projects. A particular such a effort is being developed in the Indian market, wherein an organization is working to build a sovereign LLM with state support. This initiative has committed approximately $1.25bn to AI development.

The expert foresees a AI that is more compact than top-tier systems from US and Chinese tech companies. He notes that India will have to compensate for the funding gap with expertise. “Being in India, we don’t have the luxury of investing huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we vie against say the enormous investments that the US is investing? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the brain game plays a role.”

Local Focus

Across Singapore, a public project is supporting machine learning tools trained in the region's regional languages. These languages – such as the Malay language, Thai, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, Khmer and others – are commonly poorly represented in US and Chinese LLMs.

I wish the individuals who are developing these independent AI systems were informed of just how far and how quickly the cutting edge is progressing.

A senior director participating in the program says that these systems are intended to complement more extensive AI, instead of displacing them. Platforms such as a popular AI tool and Gemini, he says, frequently find it challenging to handle regional languages and culture – speaking in stilted the Khmer language, for instance, or proposing meat-containing dishes to Malaysian users.

Creating regional-language LLMs allows national authorities to incorporate cultural nuance – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a sophisticated technology built elsewhere.

He further explains, I am prudent with the term national. I think what we’re trying to say is we wish to be more adequately included and we wish to comprehend the abilities” of AI platforms.

Multinational Cooperation

Regarding states attempting to find their place in an intensifying international arena, there’s an alternative: join forces. Experts associated with a respected institution have suggested a state-owned AI venture distributed among a alliance of emerging states.

They call the project “a collaborative AI effort”, in reference to Europe’s successful initiative to build a competitor to Boeing in the mid-20th century. The plan would involve the formation of a government-supported AI organization that would merge the resources of different nations’ AI programs – for example the UK, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, Germany, the nation of Japan, Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, the Swiss Confederation and Sweden – to establish a viable alternative to the Western and Eastern leaders.

The lead author of a paper describing the concept notes that the idea has drawn the interest of AI leaders of at least three states to date, along with multiple state AI firms. Although it is now focused on “mid-sized nations”, developing countries – the nation of Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda for example – have likewise expressed interest.

He elaborates, Currently, I think it’s simply reality there’s less trust in the assurances of the present American government. Experts are questioning such as, is it safe to rely on any of this tech? In case they choose to