🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 stands as one of the deadliest – and consequential – occasions during multiple decades of conflict in the region.

Throughout the area of the incident – the legacy of Bloody Sunday are painted on the structures and etched in public consciousness.

A protest demonstration was held on a cold but bright day in the city.

The demonstration was a protest against the practice of detention without trial – holding suspects without legal proceedings – which had been implemented in response to an extended period of violence.

Troops from the Parachute Regiment shot dead multiple civilians in the district – which was, and continues to be, a strongly nationalist population.

One image became notably iconic.

Images showed a religious figure, Fr Edward Daly, displaying a bloodied cloth as he tried to defend a crowd carrying a teenager, the fatally wounded individual, who had been killed.

News camera operators recorded much footage on the day.

The archive contains Father Daly informing a reporter that soldiers "appeared to discharge weapons randomly" and he was "totally convinced" that there was no reason for the gunfire.

The narrative of the incident was rejected by the first inquiry.

The Widgery Tribunal concluded the military had been attacked first.

Throughout the negotiation period, the administration set up another inquiry, in response to advocacy by family members, who said Widgery had been a cover-up.

During 2010, the findings by Lord Saville said that generally, the soldiers had discharged weapons initially and that not one of the individuals had posed any threat.

The then Prime Minister, the leader, issued an apology in the government chamber – stating fatalities were "without justification and unjustifiable."

Authorities commenced examine the events.

An ex-soldier, identified as the accused, was brought to trial for murder.

He was charged regarding the fatalities of James Wray, twenty-two, and 26-year-old another victim.

Soldier F was additionally charged of seeking to harm multiple individuals, additional persons, further individuals, an additional individual, and an unidentified individual.

Remains a legal order maintaining the soldier's identity protection, which his attorneys have maintained is necessary because he is at danger.

He testified the Saville Inquiry that he had only fired at individuals who were carrying weapons.

This assertion was dismissed in the concluding document.

Information from the examination was unable to be used straightforwardly as testimony in the court case.

In court, the defendant was hidden from public using a blue curtain.

He addressed the court for the initial occasion in the hearing at a hearing in that month, to respond "not guilty" when the allegations were read.

Relatives of those who were killed on the incident made the trip from Londonderry to Belfast Crown Court every day of the trial.

John Kelly, whose brother Michael was fatally wounded, said they always knew that hearing the case would be emotional.

"I can see everything in my mind's eye," the relative said, as we examined the primary sites mentioned in the trial – from the street, where his brother was shot dead, to the adjoining the courtyard, where one victim and another victim were killed.

"It returns me to my position that day.

"I assisted with the victim and place him in the medical transport.

"I experienced again every moment during the evidence.

"Notwithstanding enduring all that – it's still valuable for me."